The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Care in a Tertiary Care Facility.

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had an overwhelming impact on health care worldwide. Cancer patients represent a subgroup that is vulnerable and is under high risk. It is, therefore, necessary to analyze factors that predict outcomes in these patients so that they can be triaged accordingly to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 on cancer management. To date, the impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients remain largely unknown. Methods Data of 291 cancer patients undergoing active treatment from March 23 to August 15, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed; the incidence, demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of cancer patients infected by COVID-19 were included in the analysis. Discussion During the index period (March 23-August 15, 2020), 4,494 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were admitted at our institute. In the department of medical oncology out of 578 patients presented to outpatient department, 291 patients were admitted for active treatment. Considering the cancer patients, infection rate was 7.9% (23/291) and mortality 13% (3/23). Median age was 40 years and the majority of patients were male (60%). The most common cancer type was acute lymphoblastic leukemia presented at various stages of treatment. Twenty patients (86.9%) were discharged after full clinical recovery and negative real-time polymerase chain reaction on a nasopharyngeal swab. Anticancer treatment was modified according to the type of cancer under intensive surveillance. Conclusion Although mortality rate in COVID-19 cancer patients is elevated, our results support the feasibility and safety of continuing anticancer treatment during pandemic by endorsing consistent preventive measures, but however should be modified based on the type and prognosis of cancer.

COVID-19-associated Brugada pattern electrocardiogram: Systematic review of case reports.

AIMS: To summarize published case reports of patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Brugada pattern electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist were followed. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus up until September 2021. The incidence, clinical characteristics, and management outcomes of COVID-19 patients with a Brugada pattern ECG were identified. RESULTS: A total of 18 cases were collected. The mean age was 47.1 years and 11.1% were women. No patients had prior confirmed diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. The most common presenting clinical symptoms were fever (83.3%), chest pain (38.8%), shortness of breath (38.8%), and syncope (16.6%). All 18 patients presented with type 1 Brugada pattern ECG. Four patients (22.2%) underwent left heart catheterization, and none demonstrated the presence of obstructive coronary disease. The most common reported therapies included antipyretics (55.5%), hydroxychloroquine (27.7%), and antibiotics (16.6%). One patient (5.5%) died during hospitalization. Three patients (16.6%) who presented with syncope received either an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or wearable cardioverter defibrillator at discharge. At follow-up, 13 patients (72.2%) had resolution of type 1 Brugada pattern ECG. CONCLUSION: COVID-19-associated Brugada pattern ECG seems relatively rare. Most patients had resolution of the ECG pattern once their symptoms have improved. Increased awareness and timely use of antipyretics is warranted in this population.

RISK AND PATTERN OF INFECTIONS IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED PATIENTS OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA VACCINATED UPFRONT AGAINST PNEUMOCOCCUS & INFLUENZA

Background: Infections contribute to an early mortality risk of 15 percent in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma(NDMM) cases. There is a limited literature on the type of infections in fully vaccinated NDMM patients. Aims: To study epidemiology, clinical profile and predictors of infection in NDMM who are immunised against pneumococci and influenza. Methods: NDMM patients were prospectively studied for 6 months for the pattern of infections . All patients were vaccinated with pneumococcal and Influenza vaccine at diagnosis. PJP prophylaxis and fluconazole prophylaxis was given for patients receiving high dose steroids while acyclovir was given to all. Infections were classified as microbiologically defined, clinically defined and fever of unknown focus according to definitions published by the International Immunocompromised Host Society. Severity of infections were graded according to the NCI CTCAE Ver5. Results: Forty-eight NDMM patients with a median age 55 years comprising of 26 males and 22 females were enrolled. Renal involvement was noted in 42% of enrolled patients and two third of them required renal replacement therapy. ISSIII and R-ISS III were 70.8 % and 62.5 % respectively. 85% had poor performance status(ECOG ≥2) at baseline. RVD was the most common regimen (37%)used. 6 patients received daratumumab based regimen. Treatment response of atleast VGPR was seen in 97 % of NDMM patients. A total of 19 episodes of infections were observed during 6 months. All episodes of infections were reported in the first 45 of myeloma diagnosis(Median 6 days;Range 0-45). Ten of these episodes of infection were diagnosed during the initial evaluation for myeloma defining events. Microbiological diagnosis was possible in 63 %. Commonest infectious agent was COVID 19(n=8) followed by Gram negative bacteria (n=5) viz E.coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae . None of the eight patients who developed COVID 19 infection had received COVID vaccine as they antedated the operationalisation of national guidelines for immunisation. Respiratory and the urinary tract were the most common focus of infection. All critically ill COVID patients succumbed to progressive respiratory failure and all patients with mild and moderate COVID illness recovered uneventfully. Early mortality in our cohort of forty eight patients was twenty percent(n=10). Three fourths of infections in our cohort were Grade≥3 severity. A total of seven deaths were attributable to infectious diseases in this cohort of NDMM patients. Imune paresis was seen in eighty four percent of patients at diagnosis. On follow up at 6 months;immune paresis had persisted in only thirty seven percent. Regression analysis of variables with odds of infection is shown in Table 1 Baseline BMI<18.5 kg/m2;albumin<3g/dl and ISS or R-ISS stage ≥ 2 was found to be have statistically significant odds of predicting infection risk in the cohort of patients. The choice of myeloma regimen, presence of high risk cytogenetics and response to therapy did not correlate with increased odds of infection in our cohort. Summary/Conclusion: Conclusion In this prospective study of NDMM patients vaccinated against pneumococci and influenza at baseline;infection attributable early mortality was 14.5 %. Advanced stage of presentation, hypoalbuminemia and baseline BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 correlated with increased odds of infection. COVID vaccination and COVID appropriate behavioural practices may mitigate COVID related outcomes including deaths in myeloma patients.

Understanding the role of nACE2 in neurogenic hypertension among COVID-19 patients.

Currently, the third and fourth waves of the coronavirus disease -19 (COVID-19) pandemic are creating havoc in many parts of the world. Although vaccination programs have been launched in most countries, emerging new strains of the virus along with geographical variations are leading to varying success rates of the available vaccines. The presence of comorbidities such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and hypertension is responsible for increasing the severity of COVID-19 and, thus, the COVID-19 mortality rate. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is utilized by SARS-CoV-2 for entry into host cells, is widely expressed in the lungs, kidneys, testes, gut, adipose tissue, and brain. Infection within host cells mediates RAS overactivation, which leads to a decrease in the ACE2/ACE ratio, AT2R/AT1R ratio, and MasR/AT1R ratio. Such imbalances lead to the development of heightened inflammatory responses, such as cytokine storms, leading to post-COVID-19 complications and mortality. As the association of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hypertension remains unclear, this report provides an overview of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on patients with hypertension. We discuss here the interaction of ACE2 with SARS-CoV-2, focusing on neuronal ACE2 (nACE2), and further shed light on the possible involvement of nACE2 in hypertension. SARS-CoV-2 enters the brain through neuronal ACE2 and spreads in various regions of the brain. The effect of viral binding to neuronal ACE2 in areas of the brain that regulate salt/water balance and blood pressure is also discussed in light of the neural regulation of hypertension in COVID-19.